The US Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which are released every five years, were issued last week and one of the new guidelines’ strongest recommendation is something that consumers have already caught on to — limiting sugar intake, reports The NPD Group.
Overall, US consumers have indicated that sugar is the number one item they try to avoid in their diet and are eating less sugary foods and beverages.
The new dietary guidelines recommend that only 10% of daily calories come from added sugars.
Although this may sound like a lofty goal, consumers have cut down on foods and beverages with high sugar content, like carbonated soft drinks, fruit drinks and juice, ice cream and frozen treats, and other sweet snacks.
Consumption of sugar-free, unsweetened, or reduced sugar products, which is highest among young children and adults 55 years and older, follows the trend in concern about sugar overall.
Calories were once the top item consumers looked for on nutrition facts labels, but now it is sugar.
Cholesterol, the outcast of past dietary guidelines, is no longer a dietary concern according to the new guidelines.
NPD’s food consumption research shows that consumers are in line with this since their concern for cholesterol content has continued to decline since 2006.
Eggs, which bore the brunt of the anti-cholesterol push, are back in vogue and consumption is up as consumers look for more sources of protein.
Eating more fruits and vegetables is a perennial federal dietary standard and is still front-and-center in the new guidelines.
While consumers are eating more fruit as the top growing better-for-you snacks, vegetables are still fighting to be on the meal tables.
“Consumer alignment with the new guidelines speaks volumes to our collective shift toward eating more healthfully,” says food and beverage industry analyst Darren Seifer.
“We have nutritional information at our fingertips. Some seek it consciously and others hear it subliminally.”
“If there is a weight or health problem, it’s typically not a result of nutritional ignorance.”
