Home Americas Americas: ConAgra Foods reaches negotiated resolution on 2007 peanut butter recall

Americas: ConAgra Foods reaches negotiated resolution on 2007 peanut butter recall

ConAgra Grocery Products Company LLC and the Office of the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Georgia and the Consumer Protection Branch of the Department of Justice has made a negotiated resolution.

The resolution relates to the previously announced investigation into a peanut butter recall that occurred in February 2007.

ConAgra Foods immediately and voluntarily recalled its Peter Pan peanut butter in February 2007 once the presence of salmonella was suspected.

The product was reintroduced into the marketplace in August 2007 after ConAgra Foods took significant steps to improve the Sylvester, GA., facility where Peter Pan was made, using new knowledge about the potential for salmonella in peanut butter.

Food-safe practices

Peter Pan peanut butter has continued to be safe for consumers to enjoy since its reintroduction to the marketplace more than 7.5 years ago.

Food safety practices, including robust testing, new equipment and extensive training, have helped ensure that the plant has made safe and wholesome peanut butter on a daily basis.

“We did not, and never will, knowingly ship a product that is not safe for consumers. We’ve invested heavily in leading-edge food safety technology and practices over the past eight years, and we are thankful for all of the people who recognize that and are loyal Peter Pan fans,” said Dr. Al Bolles, chief technical and operations officer for ConAgra Foods.

“ConAgra Foods took full responsibility in 2007, taking immediate steps to determine the potential causes of and solutions for the problem and acting quickly and definitively to inform and protect consumers.”

“This incident brought to light previously unknown aspects of making safe peanut butter, and we have been passionate about sharing what we learned to help others join us in creating an even safer food supply. We will remain vigilant to maintain the trust we’ve worked so hard to earn from our consumers.”

Before the 2007 recall, food safety experts and the regulatory community believed that salmonella was unlikely to be present in finished peanut butter products.

It was generally believed that the low moisture content of finished peanut butter inhibited the growth of bacteria such as salmonella.

This case provided new insight into the essential components of making safe peanut butter, and ConAgra Foods has applied these components each day since reopening its Sylvester plant in August 2007.

Prior to 2007, ConAgra Foods employed industry standard food safety practices for the production of peanut butter, including random testing of finished products.

That testing led to a positive finding of salmonella in the Sylvester facility in 2004.

The 2004 product was destroyed prior to shipment.

The company says none of ConAgra Foods’ testing between 2004 and 2007 showed contamination in any finished product.

Less common but more robust testing protocols were used in 2007 after the evidence of a salmonella outbreak was found.

Today, ConAgra Foods uses those testing mechanisms, and more robust food safety practices at every step of its production, to ensure that each jar of peanut butter is safe for consumers.

Under the terms of a Plea Agreement with the government, ConAgra Grocery Products Company will agree to plead guilty to a misdemeanor violation of The Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act.

If the plea is accepted by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, the government’s investigation into the recall will conclude and ConAgra Grocery Products Company will make payments totaling US$11.2 million to the federal government.

The expense relating to this payment was accrued during previous periods.

Beginning in 2007, ConAgra Foods reimbursed and compensated impacted consumers and customers, created a facility in Sylvester, GA, and invested US$275 million in quality assurance infrastructure upgrades to enhance food safety practices company-wide.

The signing of the Plea Agreement was the first formal step toward completing the legal resolution of this matter.

The Plea Agreement is subject to Court approval, which will be sought along with the formal sentencing process in the coming months.

Previous articleAmericas: Food service operators should woo diners back, finds report
Next articleAmericas: Teens report positive effects on appetite after eating soy-protein snacks, find researchers